Re: intercepting WAL writes

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Mike" <mike(at)fonolo(dot)com>
Cc: "'Jonah H(dot) Harris'" <jonah(dot)harris(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: intercepting WAL writes
Date: 2008-05-29 22:18:07
Message-ID: 7719.1212099487@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

"Mike" <mike(at)fonolo(dot)com> writes:
> Is there another place in the code, I can get access to the statements (or
> statement "like" information), after a transaction commit?

No.

Bear in mind that what you have decided to do amounts to rolling your
own replication system. This is a Hard Problem. I would suggest
thinking in terms of adapting one of the existing replication projects
rather than doing it from scratch.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Kevin Grittner 2008-05-29 22:21:19 Re: Hint Bits and Write I/O
Previous Message Dimitri Fontaine 2008-05-29 22:12:31 Re: Core team statement on replication in PostgreSQL