Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: BUG #5745: geometry bug?

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Mike Fowler <mike(at)mlfowler(dot)com>, Jin <jindiax(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: BUG #5745: geometry bug?
Date: 2010-11-10 18:57:27
Message-ID: 7682.1289415447@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs
I wrote:
> So I'm thinking somebody fat-fingered the corner case
> where the perpendicular would have infinite slope, and it is falling
> through to the "take the nearer endpoint" case when it shouldn't.

Actually it's more basic than that: the line_construct_pm() function
is just completely bogus for the case of infinite slope.  Will fix.

			regards, tom lane

In response to

pgsql-bugs by date

Next:From: Chris BrowneDate: 2010-11-10 22:56:23
Subject: Re: BUG #5747: TimeStamps too far into the future are invalid
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2010-11-10 17:42:51
Subject: Re: BUG #5747: TimeStamps too far into the future are invalid

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group