Re: SunOS4

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Tatsuo Ishii <t-ishii(at)sra(dot)co(dot)jp>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: SunOS4
Date: 2001-02-27 19:13:22
Message-ID: 7668.983301202@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tatsuo Ishii <t-ishii(at)sra(dot)co(dot)jp> writes:
> I have committed massive changes for SunOS4 port. Tested on:
> SunOS 4.1.4
> Vine Linux 2.1 (variant of RedHat Linux 6.2J)
> FreeBSD 4.2-RELEASE
> Please let me know if I have broken something.

Everything still builds and passes regression on HPUX, but I concur with
Peter that the HAVE_OPTARG configure stuff must be unnecessary. Please
observe that
src/backend/bootstrap/bootstrap.c
src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c
src/backend/tcop/postgres.c
src/bin/pg_dump/pg_dump.c
src/bin/psql/startup.c
src/interfaces/ecpg/preproc/ecpg.c
all seem to be getting along fine with no configure test. There are
also a bunch of contrib modules that use optarg, and would also need
to be changed if you want to apply a configure test.

I suggest reverting the configure and config.h changes and instead
making pg_restore and pg_id follow the coding practices used in the
above-mentioned files for optarg.

regards, tom lane

In response to

  • Re: SunOS4 at 2001-02-27 08:45:29 from Tatsuo Ishii

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Olivier PRENANT 2001-02-27 19:14:19 beta5 and unixware 711
Previous Message Mario Weilguni 2001-02-27 18:39:43 Re: Re: Query precompilation?