Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: 8.4 release planning

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: 8.4 release planning
Date: 2009-01-27 06:41:24
Message-ID: 7666.1233038484@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> writes:
> The idea behind having new reviewers take on all the small patches, was, 
> of course, to give the main committers more time with patches like 
> SEPostgres.  It worked with other stuff (like Windowing and CTE).

Huh?  There were certainly non-committer reviewers for the window
functions and CTE patches.

But the larger point here is that SEPostgres has been around for nearly
two years, and has been submitted into every 8.4 commit fest not just
this last one, and has drawn no noticeable amount of enthusiasm from the
pghacker community.  It's not just a matter of "we haven't gotten to it
yet"; AFAICS no one has wanted to get to it.

			regards, tom lane

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Dave PageDate: 2009-01-27 08:49:56
Subject: Re: 8.4 release planning
Previous:From: KaiGai KoheiDate: 2009-01-27 06:38:05
Subject: Re: 8.4 release planning

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2013 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group