Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Native XML

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: Anton <antonin(dot)houska(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Native XML
Date: 2011-02-28 15:51:12
Message-ID: 7632.1298908272@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
> xpath_table is severely broken by design IMNSHO. We need a new design, 
> but I'm reluctant to work on that until someone does LATERAL, because a 
> replacement would be much nicer to design with it than without it.

Well, maybe I'm missing something, but I don't really understand why
xpath_table's design is so unreasonable.  Also, what would a better
solution look like exactly?  (Feel free to assume LATERAL is available.)

			regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2011-02-28 16:13:34
Subject: Re: PG signal handler and non-reentrant malloc/free calls
Previous:From: Andrew DunstanDate: 2011-02-28 15:40:01
Subject: Re: Native XML

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group