> We need to start marking the patches that are "Waiting on Author" as
> "Returned with Feedback", ideally after checking that the status in
> the CF application is in fact up to date. With a week left in the
> CommitFest at this point, anything that has been reviewed and still
> has issues is pretty much going to have to wait for the next round.
> We need to focus on (a) reviewing the patches that haven't been
> reviewed yet and (b) getting the stuff that is basically in good
> committed. Otherwise, we're still going to be doing this CommitFest
> in September
Sure, I only want to do that for ones which have been waiting on author for more than a couple days though. Working on that.
> I have been attempting to keep somewhat on top of the stuff that has
> become Ready for Committer, but there is too much of it for me to
> handle by myself.
Yeah, given that we're still in beta, I expected committing to be a problem. Not a surprise.
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2011-07-07 17:31:45|
|Subject: Re: Moving the community git server |
|Previous:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2011-07-07 17:26:10|
|Subject: Re: Inconsistency between postgresql.conf and docs |
pgsql-rrreviewers by date
|Next:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2011-07-07 17:35:13|
|Subject: Re: [RRR] 9.2 CF2: 20 days in |
|Previous:||From: Robert Haas||Date: 2011-07-07 16:31:55|
|Subject: Re: [RRR] 9.2 CF2: 20 days in|