Robert,
 
> We need to start marking the patches that are "Waiting on Author" as
> "Returned with Feedback", ideally after checking that the status in
> the CF application is in fact up to date.   With a week left in the
> CommitFest at this point, anything that has been reviewed and still
> has issues is pretty much going to have to wait for the next round.
> We need to focus on (a) reviewing the patches that haven't been
> reviewed yet and (b) getting the stuff that is basically in good
> shape
> committed.  Otherwise, we're still going to be doing this CommitFest
> in September

Sure, I only want to do that for ones which have been waiting on author for more than a couple days though.  Working on that.

> I have been attempting to keep somewhat on top of the stuff that has
> become Ready for Committer, but there is too much of it for me to
> handle by myself.

Yeah, given that we're still in beta, I expected committing to be a problem.  Not a surprise.

--Josh 

In response to

• Re: [RRR] 9.2 CF2: 20 days in at 2011-07-07 16:31:55 from Robert Haas

Responses

• Re: [RRR] 9.2 CF2: 20 days in at 2011-07-07 17:35:13 from Tom Lane

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:	From: Tom Lane	Date: 2011-07-07 17:31:45
	Subject: Re: Moving the community git server
Previous:	From: Tom Lane	Date: 2011-07-07 17:26:10
	Subject: Re: Inconsistency between postgresql.conf and docs

pgsql-rrreviewers by date

Next:	From: Tom Lane	Date: 2011-07-07 17:35:13
	Subject: Re: [RRR] 9.2 CF2: 20 days in
Previous:	From: Robert Haas	Date: 2011-07-07 16:31:55
	Subject: Re: [RRR] 9.2 CF2: 20 days in