| From: | "Richard P(dot) Welty" <rwelty(at)averillpark(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net> |
| Cc: | pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org, nhrcommu(at)rochester(dot)rr(dot)com |
| Subject: | Re: PostgreSQL ad images |
| Date: | 2006-02-11 17:28:25 |
| Message-ID: | 75C9F4E1-F816-4B96-8EE3-8EF9B9428980@averillpark.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-advocacy |
On Feb 11, 2006, at 9:24 AM, Robert Treat wrote:
> Well, they certainly pass the eyeball test. I do remember what I
> was waiting
> on and that was for someone to actually make use of them in adwords
> to make
> sure they worked in that system. barring that I am going to add
> them to the
> site anyway cause they are very cool. I'll drop a note here when I
> am done.
Mike Ellsworth had copies and sent them to me, so i'll be setting
them up
with google and fastclick later today, and then we'll know... i can't
see a
single reason why they wouldn't do the job.
richard
--
Richard P. Welty
rwelty(at)averillpark(dot)net 518-269-8232
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Richard P. Welty | 2006-02-11 18:00:28 | Re: PostgreSQL ad images |
| Previous Message | Jean-Paul Argudo | 2006-02-11 16:16:51 | Re: "prominant" users list |