From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | "Koichi Suzuki" <koichi(dot)szk(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | "Heikki Linnakangas" <heikki(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, "Stephen Denne" <Stephen(dot)Denne(at)datamail(dot)co(dot)nz>, "Hannu Krosing" <hannu(at)krosing(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Core team statement on replication in PostgreSQL |
Date: | 2008-06-05 00:30:34 |
Message-ID: | 7565.1212625834@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-advocacy pgsql-hackers |
"Koichi Suzuki" <koichi(dot)szk(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> Well, WAL format doesn't only depend on WAL itself, but also depend on
> each resource manager. If we introduce WAL format version
> identification, ISTM that we have to take care of the matching of
> resource manager in the master and the slave as well.
That seems a bit overdesigned. What are the prospects that two builds
of the same Postgres version are going to have different sets of
resource managers in them?
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Josh Berkus | 2008-06-05 02:17:59 | Re: Brochures for upcoming shows (was Re: Live CDs for upcoming shows) |
Previous Message | Greg Smith | 2008-06-05 00:27:29 | Re: Live CDs for upcoming shows |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Aidan Van Dyk | 2008-06-05 01:14:55 | Re: Overhauling GUCS |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2008-06-05 00:26:14 | Re: Overhauling GUCS |