Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [HACKERS] Improved \df(+) in psql + backward-compatibility

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>
Cc: PostgreSQL Patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>,PG Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Improved \df(+) in psql + backward-compatibility
Date: 2005-08-29 04:33:59
Message-ID: 751.1125290039@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackerspgsql-patches
David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> writes:
> On a slightly related note, I've noticed that psql isn't backward
> compatible.

We have never expected psql's \d commands to work against older server
versions, and two months after feature freeze isn't the time to start
making that happen.

			regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Oleg BartunovDate: 2005-08-29 05:50:15
Subject: unexpected plan for unused table (8.1dev)
Previous:From: David FetterDate: 2005-08-29 03:19:31
Subject: Improved \df(+) in psql + backward-compatibility

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Libor HohoŇ°Date: 2005-08-29 10:20:37
Subject: be-secure.c patch
Previous:From: David FetterDate: 2005-08-29 03:19:31
Subject: Improved \df(+) in psql + backward-compatibility

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group