My opinion is that sfpug is good enough for the entire bay area. We
dont need sjcpug or svpug.
On 7/21/09, Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu> wrote:
> Sorry to write twice, but i'm actually kind of curious about this.
> Don't we already have an sfpug? Is San Jose and the rest of silicon
> valley not the same group of people as San Francisco?
> If it is it seems pretty clear "sv" isn't instantly recognizable. I
> would suggest valleypug :) But really I think I would suggest you
> speak to the sfpug people about having extra locations for sfpug
In response to
pgsql-www by date
|Next:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2009-07-21 23:34:02|
|Subject: Re: Request for SVPUG mailing list |
|Previous:||From: Joshua D. Drake||Date: 2009-07-21 23:07:09|
|Subject: Re: Request for SVPUG mailing list|