Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Request for SVPUG mailing list

From: Dan Bikle <dan(dot)bikle(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, PostgreSQL www <pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Request for SVPUG mailing list
Date: 2009-07-21 23:08:53
Message-ID: 74252ed10907211608l73394428nc5b802b96a0ace29@mail.gmail.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-www
My opinion is that sfpug is good enough for the entire bay area.  We
dont need sjcpug or svpug.

On 7/21/09, Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu> wrote:
> Sorry to write twice, but i'm actually kind of curious about this.
> Don't we already have an sfpug? Is San Jose and the rest of silicon
> valley not the same group of people as San Francisco?
>
> If it is it seems pretty clear "sv" isn't instantly recognizable. I
> would suggest valleypug :) But really I think I would suggest you
> speak to the sfpug people about having extra locations for sfpug
> events.
>
> --
> greg
> http://mit.edu/~gsstark/resume.pdf
>

In response to

Responses

pgsql-www by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2009-07-21 23:34:02
Subject: Re: Request for SVPUG mailing list
Previous:From: Joshua D. DrakeDate: 2009-07-21 23:07:09
Subject: Re: Request for SVPUG mailing list

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group