Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
> On 12/12/2010 01:43 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
>> (Hm, I wonder whether BCC defines them either...)

> Is anyone building the client stuff with BCC any more? I don't recall 
> having heard of anyone doing so for quite some years.

It's a fair question.  We could clean up some of these messy ifdefs
if we dropped support for that combination.  I assume that an MSVC-built
libpq.dll would still work for Borland users, no?

			regards, tom lane

In response to

• Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Make S_IRGRP etc available in mingw builds as well as MSVC. at 2010-12-12 18:47:52 from Andrew Dunstan

Responses

• Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Make S_IRGRP etc available in mingw builds as well as MSVC. at 2010-12-12 19:07:30 from Magnus Hagander

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:	From: Magnus Hagander	Date: 2010-12-12 19:07:30
	Subject: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Make S_IRGRP etc available in mingw builds as well as MSVC.
Previous:	From: Andrew Dunstan	Date: 2010-12-12 18:47:52
	Subject: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Make S_IRGRP etc available in mingw builds as well as MSVC.

pgsql-committers by date

Next:	From: Magnus Hagander	Date: 2010-12-12 19:07:30
	Subject: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Make S_IRGRP etc available in mingw builds as well as MSVC.
Previous:	From: Andrew Dunstan	Date: 2010-12-12 18:47:52
	Subject: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Make S_IRGRP etc available in mingw builds as well as MSVC.