Re: [HACKERS] Re: Tuple-valued datums on Alpha (was Re: 7.1 on DEC/Alpha)

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Brent Verner <brent(at)rcfile(dot)org>
Cc: pgsql-patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: Tuple-valued datums on Alpha (was Re: 7.1 on DEC/Alpha)
Date: 2000-12-27 15:08:29
Message-ID: 7339.977929709@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

Brent Verner <brent(at)rcfile(dot)org> writes:
> after hours in the gdb-hole, I see this... maybe a clue? :)

I don't think that comment means anything. Possibly it's a leftover
from a time when there was something unportable there. But if att_align
were broken on Alphas, you'd have a lot worse problems than what you're
seeing.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Rod Taylor 2000-12-27 15:09:59 Re: PHP and PostgreSQL
Previous Message Daniele Orlandi 2000-12-27 14:39:14 Re: PHP and PostgreSQL

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2000-12-27 15:18:45 Re: Re: Tuple-valued datums on Alpha (was Re: 7.1 on DEC/Alpha)
Previous Message Chih-Chang Hsieh 2000-12-27 11:55:47 About PQsetClientEncoding(),"SET NAMES",and "SET CLIENT_ENCODING"