Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [HACKERS] Re: Tuple-valued datums on Alpha (was Re: 7.1 on DEC/Alpha)

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Brent Verner <brent(at)rcfile(dot)org>
Cc: pgsql-patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: Tuple-valued datums on Alpha (was Re: 7.1 on DEC/Alpha)
Date: 2000-12-27 15:08:29
Message-ID: 7339.977929709@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackerspgsql-patches
Brent Verner <brent(at)rcfile(dot)org> writes:
> after hours in the gdb-hole, I see this... maybe a clue? :)

I don't think that comment means anything.  Possibly it's a leftover
from a time when there was something unportable there.  But if att_align
were broken on Alphas, you'd have a lot worse problems than what you're
seeing.

			regards, tom lane

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Rod TaylorDate: 2000-12-27 15:09:59
Subject: Re: PHP and PostgreSQL
Previous:From: Daniele OrlandiDate: 2000-12-27 14:39:14
Subject: Re: PHP and PostgreSQL

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2000-12-27 15:18:45
Subject: Re: Re: Tuple-valued datums on Alpha (was Re: 7.1 on DEC/Alpha)
Previous:From: Chih-Chang HsiehDate: 2000-12-27 11:55:47
Subject: About PQsetClientEncoding(),"SET NAMES",and "SET CLIENT_ENCODING"

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group