Re: unite recovery.conf and postgresql.conf

From: Joshua Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Tatsuo Ishii <ishii(at)postgresql(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: unite recovery.conf and postgresql.conf
Date: 2011-09-25 18:39:42
Message-ID: 727620286.50559.1316975982458.JavaMail.root@mail-1.01.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> There might be a use case for a separate directive include_if_exists,
> or some such name. But I think the user should have to tell us very
> clearly that it's okay for the file to not be found.

Better to go back to include_directory, then.

--Josh Berkus

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Marti Raudsepp 2011-09-25 18:43:05 Re: index-only scans
Previous Message Jeff Davis 2011-09-25 18:30:54 Re: Range Types - symmetric