Re: FW: Patch for current_schemas to optionally include implicit

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Dave Page <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk>, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: FW: Patch for current_schemas to optionally include implicit
Date: 2002-06-14 16:58:32
Message-ID: 7269.1024073912@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-patches

Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
>> This looks good --- but Bruce, when you apply it don't forget to bump
>> catversion.h.

> Yep, thanks, got it. Hold, do we need to bump catversion for changes
> that add new functionality, or just ones that make the system broken
> without it? Would this break an existing installation?

Yes, because the catalog entry for current_schemas wouldn't match the C
code.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Paul Bethe 2002-06-14 18:03:15 Re: New Patch For CallableStmt (against current CVS)
Previous Message Tom Lane 2002-06-14 16:57:35 Re: guc.c and postgresql.conf.sample constistency checker