Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: contrib/dblink update

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: contrib/dblink update
Date: 2002-04-15 05:02:58
Message-ID: 7264.1018846978@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-patches
Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com> writes:
> On a somewhat unrelated topic, I never got any feedback on the 
> unknownin/out patch and the mb_substring patch. Is there anything else I 
> need to do to get those applied?

In my mind, the unknownin/out business was waiting on commentary from
Tatsuo or Hiroshi on whether it was a bug for the TEXT code to be
rejecting byte sequences that had got by the initial pq_getstr
conversion.  If it is, then we should be fixing TEXT not adding new code
for UNKNOWN.  But if TEXT's behavior is considered desirable then we'll
need to change UNKNOWN.

Is the mb patch the one that fixes John Gray's oversight in substring?
If so, I thought that was due to be applied.  Bruce, were you going to
do that?

			regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Michael LoftisDate: 2002-04-15 05:12:36
Subject: Re: ANSI Compliant Inserts
Previous:From: Peter EisentrautDate: 2002-04-15 04:52:21
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] ANSI Compliant Inserts

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group