Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [HACKERS] SPI Headers -- RPM distribution

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Lamar Owen <lamar(dot)owen(at)wgcr(dot)org>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org, pgsql-ports(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] SPI Headers -- RPM distribution
Date: 1999-12-21 15:47:16
Message-ID: 7263.945791236@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackerspgsql-ports
Lamar Owen <lamar(dot)owen(at)wgcr(dot)org> writes:
> Also, I have noticed that some headers are #included with <>, while
> others are included with "".  Now, I understand that system headers
> should be included with <>, but I'm seeing PostgreSQL headers wrapped
> with <>.  This makes the cpp -M variants a little confusing -- while
> tracing down the header dependencies, I started using cpp -MM, which
> only follows user headers and not system headers -- but it doesn't get
> all of the headers.

Bruce has done a nice job of cleaning that up in current sources, but
yes, 6.5.* and older releases were mighty inconsistent about header
inclusions.

			regards, tom lane

In response to

pgsql-ports by date

Next:From: Hannu KrosingDate: 1999-12-21 16:44:45
Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] Announce: PostgreSQL-6.5.3 binaries available for Windows NT
Previous:From: Lamar OwenDate: 1999-12-21 15:40:18
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] SPI Headers -- RPM distribution

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Zeugswetter Andreas SBDate: 1999-12-21 16:16:27
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] LONG varsize - how to go on (pgindent)
Previous:From: Lamar OwenDate: 1999-12-21 15:40:18
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] SPI Headers -- RPM distribution

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group