Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: State of support for back PG branches

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Steve Atkins <steve(at)blighty(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: State of support for back PG branches
Date: 2005-09-27 04:19:36
Message-ID: 7254.1127794776@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Steve Atkins <steve(at)blighty(dot)com> writes:
> We'll be skipping 8.0 completely and the next step will probably be to
> 8.1.something (or possibly 8.2.something, depending on how bizgres
> looks in 3 months time).

[ raised eyebrow... ]  Has bizgres obtained a crystal ball from
somewhere?  There is *no* way anyone could provide you anything that
has any legitimate claim on the name "PG 8.2" three months from now.

			regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Joshua D. DrakeDate: 2005-09-27 04:54:46
Subject: Re: State of support for back PG branches
Previous:From: Joshua D. DrakeDate: 2005-09-27 04:07:45
Subject: Re: State of support for back PG branches

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group