Re: changed behavior in libpq odbc driver

From: "Scot Loach" <sloach(at)sandvine(dot)com>
To: "Marko Ristola" <marko(dot)ristola(at)kolumbus(dot)fi>
Cc: <pgsql-odbc(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: changed behavior in libpq odbc driver
Date: 2005-08-21 15:00:31
Message-ID: 71837C040963F748B9B94E123A289678664C28@mailserver.sandvine.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-odbc

Thanks for the clarification, Marko.
I use ODBC 3.0, so it would seem that this is a bug.

scot.

-----Original Message-----
From: pgsql-odbc-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org
[mailto:pgsql-odbc-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org]On Behalf Of Marko Ristola
Sent: Sunday, August 21, 2005 10:36 AM
Cc: pgsql-odbc(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [ODBC] changed behavior in libpq odbc driver

Please check, but ODBC 3 should return SQL_NO_DATA, when
no data has been updated.

ODBC 2 should return SQL_SUCCESS wether any rows were updated, or not.

So it depends on the ODBC standard, that the client program chooses.

Marko Ristola

Scot Loach wrote:

>I'm not sure whether the old driver or the new one is correct.
>
>When executing an UPDATE query with a WHERE clause, if the WHERE clause does not match any rows, the old driver returns SQL_NO_DATA. The new driver returns SQL_SUCCESS.
>
>
>
>---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
>TIP 9: In versions below 8.0, the planner will ignore your desire to
> choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not
> match
>
>

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 4: Have you searched our list archives?

http://archives.postgresql.org

Browse pgsql-odbc by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Scot Loach 2005-08-21 15:02:01 Re: "Official" version
Previous Message Marko Ristola 2005-08-21 14:36:01 Re: changed behavior in libpq odbc driver