From: | Hasns-Juergen Schoenig <postgres(at)cybertec(dot)at> |
---|---|
To: | Carlos Henrique Reimer <carlosreimer(at)yahoo(dot)com(dot)br> |
Cc: | pgsql-odbc(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Application bottlenecks |
Date: | 2005-09-08 16:47:02 |
Message-ID: | 715FC5E7-2CEE-4C13-80F2-7FAB9FEA50D7@cybertec.at |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-odbc |
Reimer,
Did you use Windows XP or Windows 2000?
Best regards,
Hans
Am 07.09.2005 um 13:24 schrieb Carlos Henrique Reimer:
> Hello,
>
> We are using Cobol Microfocus and pgsqlODBC to access Postgresql.
>
> Originally these applications only accessed Oracle databases
> without ODBC, only Procobol and now we´re migrating to Postgresql
> and ODBC. The application logic doesn´t changed, but some
> applications have higher response times than the Oracle version. We
> worked on database tunning but even so, the response times are very
> different.
>
> I turned on logging sql statemants in the server (log_duration) and
> discovered that the sum of all SQL duration times gives only 30% of
> the total response time felt at the client. This gives me a suspect
> that the bottleneck is outside the server.
>
> Am I in the right way?
>
> How can I discover the SQL duration times at the client? Is there
> some tool I could use?
>
> Thanks in advance!
>
> Reimer
>
> Yahoo! Messenger com voz: PROMOÇÃO VOCÊ PODE LEVAR UMA VIAGEM NA
> CONVERSA. Participe!
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Merlin Moncure | 2005-09-08 17:07:12 | Re: Application bottlenecks |
Previous Message | Merlin Moncure | 2005-09-08 13:18:45 | Re: Application bottlenecks |