Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Proposal: new border setting in psql

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "D'Arcy J(dot)M(dot) Cain" <darcy(at)druid(dot)net>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Proposal: new border setting in psql
Date: 2009-01-07 23:12:58
Message-ID: 7157.1231369978@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
"D'Arcy J.M. Cain" <darcy(at)druid(dot)net> writes:
> Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:
>> As I remember, no actual patch was posted for this.

> There was.  I am attaching it again in case there were any changes to
> original files in the meantime.

I think what Bruce meant to say is that this patch doesn't produce 100%
spec-compliant ReST, and that almost-ReST doesn't seem like a good
feature.

			regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2009-01-07 23:24:38
Subject: Re: Proposal: new border setting in psql
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2009-01-07 22:56:50
Subject: Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Adjust things so that the query_string of a cached plan and the

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group