Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Recent SIGSEGV failures in buildfarm HEAD

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Stefan Kaltenbrunner <stefan(at)kaltenbrunner(dot)cc>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Recent SIGSEGV failures in buildfarm HEAD
Date: 2006-12-28 15:24:54
Message-ID: 7154.1167319494@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackerspgsql-patches
Stefan Kaltenbrunner <stefan(at)kaltenbrunner(dot)cc> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> Several of the buildfarm machines are exhibiting repeatable signal 11
>> crashes in what seem perfectly ordinary queries.

> no stack trace yet however impala at least seems to be running out of
> memory (!) with 380MB of RAM and some 800MB of swap(and no other tasks)
> during the regression run. Maybe something is causing a dramatic
> increase in memory usage that is causing the random failures (in impalas
> case the OOM-killer actually decides to terminate the postmaster) ?

No, most all the failures I've looked at are sig11 not sig9.

It is interesting that the failures are not as consistent as I first
thought --- the machines that are showing failures actually fail maybe
one time in two.

			regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2006-12-28 15:48:20
Subject: Re: Dead Space Map for vacuum
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2006-12-28 15:01:25
Subject: Re: Deadline-Based Vacuum Delay

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2006-12-28 17:50:19
Subject: Re: Load distributed checkpoint
Previous:From: Stefan KaltenbrunnerDate: 2006-12-28 13:41:57
Subject: Re: Recent SIGSEGV failures in buildfarm HEAD

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group