| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Devrim GÜNDÜZ <devrim(at)CommandPrompt(dot)com> |
| Cc: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)CommandPrompt(dot)com>, "Gavin M(dot) Roy" <gmr(at)myyearbook(dot)com>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Dave Page <dpage(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Greg Smith <gsmith(at)gregsmith(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Machine available for community use |
| Date: | 2007-07-31 05:54:38 |
| Message-ID: | 7149.1185861278@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Devrim =?ISO-8859-1?Q?G=DCND=DCZ?= <devrim(at)CommandPrompt(dot)com> writes:
> On Mon, 2007-07-30 at 23:36 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> There isn't any "secret sauce" in the RHEL build process
> Really? Are the compiler options, etc, public?
Certainly. If you doubt it, try comparing pg_config output for the RHEL
and CentOS packages. (And if the CFLAGS entries are different, you
should be mentioning it to the CentOS package maintainer, not me.)
> Actually I did not compare -- But both of them were 4.3 (RHEL 4.3 and
> CentOS 4.3). I'm assuming that they have the same package versions,
> right?
> BTW, they were stock 4.3 -- no updates, etc.
RHEL 4.3 was obsoleted more than a year ago, so I'd like to think that
nobody finds "no update" comparisons to be very relevant today ...
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Devrim GÜNDÜZ | 2007-07-31 07:04:11 | Re: Machine available for community use |
| Previous Message | Devrim GÜNDÜZ | 2007-07-31 05:24:11 | Re: Machine available for community use |