| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Chris <rfusca(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: testing plpython3u on 9.0beta2 |
| Date: | 2010-06-29 00:45:35 |
| Message-ID: | 7142.1277772335@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> writes:
> Why are we using RTLD_GLOBAL?
Some guy named Eisentraut wanted it for plpython:
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2001-05/msg00563.php
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-committers/2001-05/msg00283.php
Possibly that no longer applies, though. In general it seems like
our usage of loadable modules treats them all as independent objects,
so that not using RTLD_GLOBAL would be a more sensible policy. If it
won't break any of the existing PLs then I'm fine with removing it.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | KaiGai Kohei | 2010-06-29 01:10:57 | Re: get_whatever_oid, part 1: object types with unqualifed names |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2010-06-29 00:24:09 | Re: Keepalives win32 |