Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [PORTS] Re: patch for minor Win32 makefile bug

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Fred Yankowski <fred(at)ontosys(dot)com>
Cc: Jason(dot)Tishler(at)dothill(dot)com, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-ports(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [PORTS] Re: patch for minor Win32 makefile bug
Date: 2001-04-03 20:04:54
Message-ID: 7120.986328294@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-patchespgsql-ports
Fred Yankowski <fred(at)ontosys(dot)com> writes:
> I experimented with different ways to do this patch and discussed this
> with Jason Tischler, and I now conclude that the meaning of DLLLIBS in
> the two makefiles is different enough that it doesn't make sense to
> try to factor-out common information to share between them.

Well, in that case we DEFINITELY ought to replace them with two
differently-named symbols.  However, I'm pretty confused about
which is which and what gets used where.  Suggestions?

			regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

pgsql-ports by date

Next:From: Fred YankowskiDate: 2001-04-03 21:18:04
Subject: Re: [PORTS] Re: patch for minor Win32 makefile bug
Previous:From: Fred YankowskiDate: 2001-04-03 19:41:12
Subject: Re: [PORTS] Re: patch for minor Win32 makefile bug

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Kyle VanderBeekDate: 2001-04-03 21:09:33
Subject: JDBC int8 hack
Previous:From: Fred YankowskiDate: 2001-04-03 19:41:12
Subject: Re: [PORTS] Re: patch for minor Win32 makefile bug

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group