Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: btree_gist (was: CommitFest progress - or lack thereof)

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Oleg Bartunov <oleg(at)sai(dot)msu(dot)su>, Teodor Sigaev <teodor(at)sigaev(dot)ru>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: btree_gist (was: CommitFest progress - or lack thereof)
Date: 2011-02-17 15:19:14
Message-ID: 7107.1297955954@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackerspgsql-rrreviewers
Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> 2011/2/17 Oleg Bartunov <oleg(at)sai(dot)msu(dot)su>:
>> We need to fix inet support as Tom complained and then will commit.

> I think those are two separate issues.

Yeah ... also, fixing the inet problem looked to me like it'd probably
be a major compatibility break (change in on-disk index contents).
Not something to rush into at the end of a development cycle.

In any case, I was pointing to that as a reason that btree_gist wasn't
ready to be in core.  It has nothing to do with KNN-ifying the module.
I would like to see that happen before 9.1, else KNN will go out with
not very many actual use-cases supported.

			regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2011-02-17 15:22:30
Subject: Re: Debian readline/libedit breakage
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2011-02-17 15:09:37
Subject: Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Fix blatantly uninitialized variable in recent commit.

pgsql-rrreviewers by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2011-02-17 21:43:12
Subject: Re: btree_gist (was: CommitFest progress - or lack thereof)
Previous:From: Robert HaasDate: 2011-02-17 11:34:25
Subject: Re: btree_gist (was: CommitFest progress - or lack thereof)

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group