| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Teodor Sigaev <teodor(at)sigaev(dot)ru> |
| Cc: | Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, pgsql-patches(at)postgreSQL(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Remove lossy-operator RECHECK flag? |
| Date: | 2008-04-14 16:48:19 |
| Message-ID: | 7104.1208191699@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
Teodor Sigaev <teodor(at)sigaev(dot)ru> writes:
> Why don't use suggested way for GIN index over tsvector?
> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2008-04/msg00812.php
I had forgotten the details :-(. Will adopt that code.
>> This is still WIP because I haven't touched any contrib code, but
>> as far as the main backend goes I think it's ready to apply.
> Patch to all contrib modules:
> http://www.sigaev.ru/misc/contrib.patch.gz
Ooops, we duplicated work :-(. Will compare with your version before
applying.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2008-04-14 16:56:03 | Re: pg_dump object sorting |
| Previous Message | Chad Showalter | 2008-04-14 16:47:30 | rule for update view that updates/inserts into 2 tables |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2008-04-14 17:52:38 | Terminating a backend |
| Previous Message | Teodor Sigaev | 2008-04-14 16:37:49 | Re: [HACKERS] Remove lossy-operator RECHECK flag? |