Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Postgres vr.s Oracle

From: "Mark Wong" <markwkm(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "Jonah H(dot) Harris" <jonah(dot)harris(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: "Peter Eisentraut" <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, justin <justin(at)emproshunts(dot)com>, "Josh Berkus" <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, "Brian Hurt" <bhurt(at)janestcapital(dot)com>, pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Postgres vr.s Oracle
Date: 2008-12-16 19:53:08
Message-ID: 70c01d1d0812161153g6de5ba03hd8303c027e9ccc@mail.gmail.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy
On Mon, Dec 15, 2008 at 6:17 AM, Jonah H. Harris <jonah(dot)harris(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 15, 2008 at 3:25 AM, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> wrote:
>> Well, then the first order of business would be to write a benchmark kit.  I
>> have been thinking for a while that we should make our own maintained
>> version of the DBT+* suite, or whatever other suite is appropriate.  And
>> then start running it.
>
> Agreed.  For a start on TPC-C, EnterpriseDB has a closer version of the kit.

I don't recall turning away patches to make the dbt kits less TPC spec
compliant...

Regards,
Mark

In response to

Responses

pgsql-advocacy by date

Next:From: Mark WongDate: 2008-12-16 19:56:07
Subject: Re: Postgres vr.s Oracle
Previous:From: Dan LangilleDate: 2008-12-16 16:55:12
Subject: Re: copy/paste URL for a tarball

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group