Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> writes:
> I just noticed that we restrict creation of a role named "public", but
> this is case-sensitive -- i.e. we don't restrict roles named PUBLIC,
> Is this intended?
Yes. If you had a role named that, you might think that
GRANT whatever TO PUBLIC
should refer to that role.
regards, tom lane
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Alvaro Herrera||Date: 2010-08-24 23:22:20|
|Subject: Re: why restrict role "public" but not "Public"?|
|Previous:||From: Alvaro Herrera||Date: 2010-08-24 22:34:11|
|Subject: why restrict role "public" but not "Public"?|