| From: | John Gage <jsmgage(at)numericable(dot)fr> |
|---|---|
| To: | Guillaume Lelarge <guillaume(at)lelarge(dot)info> |
| Cc: | 'pgAdmin Support List' <pgadmin-support(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: pgAdmin III v1.10.2 released |
| Date: | 2010-03-17 13:23:21 |
| Message-ID: | 708D0C21-7975-4198-812B-1C41A8FC4C14@numericable.fr |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgadmin-support |
An incremental approach is undoubtedly best. Identifying the PK's and
FK's (not connecting them, just identifying them) in the Query Builder
might be an easy first step.
On Mar 17, 2010, at 12:29 PM, Guillaume Lelarge wrote:
> Le 15/03/2010 09:29, John Gage a écrit :
>> This is my opportunity to say that I do use the graphical query
>> builder.
>>
>> It would be great if it could be brought into line with (subsume the
>> code for) DBUML, the ArgoUML class diagramming software for databases
>> (http://sourceforge.net/projects/dbuml/).
>>
>> Seeing the relationships between tables and the tables themselves
>> is a
>> tremendous convenience.
>>
>> I wish I could offer to do this myself, but my C/C++ coding skills
>> simply aren't anywhere near good enough.
>>
>
> Yes, this is something I would like to have in pgAdmin too. I don't
> feel
> I have the skills to code such a functionnality, but it would be great
> to have someone working on a patch to get that.
>
>
> --
> Guillaume.
> http://www.postgresqlfr.org
> http://dalibo.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Guillaume Lelarge | 2010-03-17 13:56:51 | Re: Creating a new database in pgadmin |
| Previous Message | Vinicius Borges | 2010-03-17 13:09:28 | Problem with libpq.so.5 in pgadmin3-1.10.2 |