Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [HACKERS] Re: Call for port testing on fmgr changes

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Ryan Kirkpatrick <pgsql(at)rkirkpat(dot)net>
Cc: pgsql-ports(at)postgreSQL(dot)org, pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: Call for port testing on fmgr changes
Date: 2000-06-16 14:46:35
Message-ID: 7022.961166795@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackerspgsql-ports
Ryan Kirkpatrick <pgsql(at)rkirkpat(dot)net> writes:
> 	Not all of my Linux/Alpha patches are related to fmgr, there are a
> few related to s_lock and such (which can probably be put into the source
> tree with #ifdefs).

Right-o.  Up to now we haven't worried about that, but now that the
fundamental problem is fixed (I hope), we can start cleaning up the
smaller details so that Linux/Alpha will be supported out-of-the-box.

			regards, tom lane

In response to

pgsql-ports by date

Next:From: Doug EdmundsDate: 2000-06-16 17:21:04
Subject: Regression test results not the same
Previous:From: Ryan KirkpatrickDate: 2000-06-16 13:14:22
Subject: Re: Call for port testing on fmgr changes

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Thomas LockhartDate: 2000-06-16 14:50:38
Subject: Re: Changes to functions and triggers
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2000-06-16 14:44:19
Subject: Re: Changes to functions and triggers

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group