Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: OpenSSL Applink

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
Cc: Dave Page <dpage(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: OpenSSL Applink
Date: 2007-10-01 15:14:43
Message-ID: 7020.1191251683@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-patches
Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> writes:
> On Mon, Oct 01, 2007 at 10:51:01AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> I'd vote for backpatching, but only as far as 8.2, seeing that we're
>> abandoning the older branches on Windows.

> Should we backpatch a version of it to previous versions that does just the
> error stack manipulation, or just ignore on the grounds that nobody has
> reported the problem there (it's there, but it's a lot more narrow - I know
> it's there, but I havent' been able to provoket it due to not knowing
> enough about setting up certificate chains and such)

That's only a cosmetic problem (wrong error message), right?  I'd vote
for no backpatch, at least for now --- I'd rather see this change get
through beta testing first.  Anytime you're fooling with interactions
with some other package, the risk of portability issues is high.

			regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Richard RowellDate: 2007-10-01 16:17:14
Subject: Patch to inline stable SQL set returning UDFs
Previous:From: Magnus HaganderDate: 2007-10-01 14:59:43
Subject: Re: OpenSSL Applink

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group