From: | Stuart Bishop <stuart(at)stuartbishop(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Re: [GENERAL] pgstattuple triggered checkpoint failure and database outage? |
Date: | 2009-03-31 09:17:10 |
Message-ID: | 6bc73d4c0903310217v551acfffqf225b8e51bda1e76@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 2:20 PM, Heikki Linnakangas
<heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
>> This is exactly what happened, and temporary tables belonging to other
>> sessions where fed to pgstattuple.
>
> +1 for throwing an error. That's what we do for views, composite types, and
> GIN indexes as well. If you want to write a query to call pgstattuple for
> all tables in pg_class, you'll need to exclude all those cases anyway. To
> exclude temp tables of other sessions, you'll need to add "AND
> pg_is_other_temp_schema(relnamespace)".
I would have expected an exception to be raised personally.
> I'm ok with returning NULLs as well, but returning zeroes doesn't feel
> right.
--
Stuart Bishop <stuart(at)stuartbishop(dot)net>
http://www.stuartbishop.net/
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Chris.Ellis | 2009-03-31 09:37:53 | Server Performance |
Previous Message | Richard Huxton | 2009-03-31 08:34:57 | Re: Schema for J2EE project |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Zdenek Kotala | 2009-03-31 11:37:16 | Re: Solaris getopt_long and PostgreSQL |
Previous Message | Heikki Linnakangas | 2009-03-31 07:24:03 | Re: [GENERAL] pgstattuple triggered checkpoint failure and database outage? |