| From: | "Greg Sabino Mullane" <greg(at)turnstep(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Disparity in search_path SHOW and SET |
| Date: | 2005-12-20 17:30:07 |
| Message-ID: | 6b4948bc5f7c87d5526b1549746ffd47@biglumber.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
> Well, sure, because you told it to. Why isn't the last parameter "false"?
Thanks. I knew I was overlooking something. I've obviously been staring at
the code too long. :) Still, would it make more sense for SHOW search_path
to return this:
"$user",public
- --
Greg Sabino Mullane greg(at)turnstep(dot)com
PGP Key: 0x14964AC8 200512201227
http://biglumber.com/x/web?pk=2529DF6AB8F79407E94445B4BC9B906714964AC8
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
iD8DBQFDqD83vJuQZxSWSsgRAj1gAKDIRGqzD7zORJQwrxLM+oKWOiAPKgCg9/xK
OGZIoWEnLdw+Qi71lKbCg0g=
=0dBJ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2005-12-20 17:44:35 | Re: Disparity in search_path SHOW and SET |
| Previous Message | Martin Pitt | 2005-12-20 17:27:55 | Re: horology regression test failure |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2005-12-20 17:37:57 | Re: PLpgSQL: list of scalars as row for assign stmt, fore and fors stms |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2005-12-20 17:21:20 | Re: Disparity in search_path SHOW and SET |