Re: [PATCHES] Win32 CHECK_FOR_INTERRUPTS() performance

From: "Merlin Moncure" <merlin(dot)moncure(at)rcsonline(dot)com>
To: "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: "Qingqing Zhou" <zhouqq(at)cs(dot)toronto(dot)edu>, <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] Win32 CHECK_FOR_INTERRUPTS() performance
Date: 2005-10-25 12:25:21
Message-ID: 6EE64EF3AB31D5448D0007DD34EEB3417DD697@Herge.rcsinc.local
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> "Merlin Moncure" <merlin(dot)moncure(at)rcsonline(dot)com> writes:
> > OK, running the latest patch. Observations:
> > ...
> > I ran tests for about an hour, randomly killing/canceling backends
> > without any problems.
>
> Are we all comfortable that
> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2005-10/msg01009.php
> is OK to apply?

Yea. I can vouch for Magnus as well (he said so off list). I'd vote
with my own servers anyways.

Merlin

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Magnus Hagander 2005-10-25 12:37:33 Re: [PATCHES] Win32 CHECK_FOR_INTERRUPTS() performance
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2005-10-25 11:51:06 Re: Surge in MySQL converters