Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [NOVICE] Last ID Problem

From: "Merlin Moncure" <merlin(dot)moncure(at)rcsonline(dot)com>
To: "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "Greg Stark" <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu>
Subject: Re: [NOVICE] Last ID Problem
Date: 2005-02-02 21:30:52
Message-ID: 6EE64EF3AB31D5448D0007DD34EEB3412A7606@Herge.rcsinc.local (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
> This "portable" function is so unportable that I see no reason to
> accept it as precedent.

Hm. Instead of altering the syntax, what slipping in the last
inserted/updated tuple into the PQResult object?  Maybe is a protocol
level option?  Now everybody gets to use it with minimal muss.

Merlin



pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Joshua D. DrakeDate: 2005-02-02 21:54:48
Subject: Re: pg_dump bug in 7.3.9 with sequences
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2005-02-02 21:21:48
Subject: Re: pg_dump bug in 7.3.9 with sequences

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group