Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Win32 signals & sockets

From: "Merlin Moncure" <merlin(dot)moncure(at)rcsonline(dot)com>
To: "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: "PostgreSQL Patches" <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>,"Magnus Hagander" <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net>
Subject: Re: Win32 signals & sockets
Date: 2004-11-16 21:02:53
Message-ID: 6EE64EF3AB31D5448D0007DD34EEB3412A7527@Herge.rcsinc.local (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-patches
Tom Lane wrote:
> It's the increase in variance between the Unix and Windows code paths
> that's really bothering me.  We went into this project on the promise
> that there weren't going to be thousands of lines of #ifdef WIN32
stuff,
> and I'm not happy in the least with the way postmaster.c looks now,
let
> alone after applying this patch.

I've been following this thread for a bit and I have to admit I wouldn't
mind seeing the shmmem part of Magnus's patch go in.  Windows suffers vs
unix generally on process creation times and any improvement here would
be welcome.

Merlin

Responses

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2004-11-16 21:20:57
Subject: Re: Win32 signals & sockets
Previous:From: Magnus HaganderDate: 2004-11-16 20:42:23
Subject: Re: Win32 signals & sockets

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group