> If we change the syntax, say by using SUBCOMMIT/SUBABORT for
> subtransactions, then using a simple ABORT would abort the whole
> transaction tree.
Question: with the new syntax, would issuing a BEGIN inside a already
started transaction result in an error?
My concern is about say, a pl/pgsql function that opened and closed a
transation. This could result in different behaviors depending if
called from within a transaction, which is not true of the old syntax.
Then again, since a statement is always transactionally wrapped, would
it be required to always issue SUBBEGIN if issued from within a
function? This would address my concern.
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Merlin Moncure||Date: 2004-07-02 17:20:25|
|Subject: anonymous cvs failure|
|Previous:||From: Alvaro Herrera||Date: 2004-07-02 17:09:56|
|Subject: Subtle bug in clog.c|