From: | "Rocco Altier" <RoccoA(at)Routescape(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "Andrew Dunstan" <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Changes for AIX buildfarm |
Date: | 2005-07-18 16:48:58 |
Message-ID: | 6E0907A94904D94B99D7F387E08C4F5730E8EA@FALCON.INSIGHT |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-patches |
It looks like I jumped the gun a bit on sending out the patches, since I
was intending to have the failed build report show up in the buildfarm
at the same time.
I am running another build with send so that the error will show on the
build farm.
The animal name is appropiately: kookaburra
-rocco
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Andrew Dunstan [mailto:andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net]
> Sent: Monday, July 18, 2005 12:42 PM
> To: Tom Lane
> Cc: Rocco Altier; pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org
> Subject: Re: [PATCHES] Changes for AIX buildfarm
>
>
>
>
> Tom Lane wrote:
>
> >"Rocco Altier" <RoccoA(at)Routescape(dot)com> writes:
> >
> >
> >>Need to have these patches applied to get AIX 5.2 to build
> as a member
> >>of the buildfarm.
> >>
> >>
> >
> >Er, which buildfarm report is prompting this?
> >
> >
> >
>
> Rocco is probably doing what I normally ask, which is to get builds
> working before starting to upload results to the buildfarm server (a
> request which is more honored in the breach than the observance).
>
> cheers
>
> andrew
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Marko Kreen | 2005-07-18 16:57:07 | Re: Changes for AIX buildfarm |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2005-07-18 16:46:42 | Re: Changes for AIX buildfarm |