Re: feature request ?

From: Michael Glaesemann <grzm(at)myrealbox(dot)com>
To: sad <sad(at)bankir(dot)ru>
Cc: 'pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org' <pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: feature request ?
Date: 2004-06-24 15:51:58
Message-ID: 6C87495E-C5F6-11D8-B2C1-000A95C88220@myrealbox.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-sql


On Jun 24, 2004, at 6:39 PM, sad wrote:

> ...IF ELSEIF ELSE
> it's all clear
> but what about unequality of BOOL type possible value set and IF
> alternatives
> set

In my opinion the short answer is NULL is here because of the SQL
standard. The SQL standard does not specify any kind of "IF
alternative" for 3-valued logic afaik. Why should PostgreSQL go beyond
what the standard specifies in this hairy area? Three-valued logic is
something I strive to stay away from to the best of my ability, as it
is far too complicated for my feeble mind.

Michael Glaesemann
grzm myrealbox com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-sql by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jaime Casanova 2004-06-24 17:32:59 Re: feature request ?
Previous Message Stephan Szabo 2004-06-24 14:34:18 Re: feature request ?