Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: idea: global temp tables

From: "vacuum" <vacuum(at)quantentunnel(dot)de>
To: "'Tom Lane'" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>,"'Alvaro Herrera'" <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: "'Pavel Stehule'" <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>,"'PostgreSQL Hackers'" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: idea: global temp tables
Date: 2009-04-28 15:31:19
Message-ID: 6C5D89CA3E334E93B83579BBE3884195@zero (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Perhaps call them "session tables" instead of "temp tables"?

			regards, tom lane

Or "transient table" ... 

Maybe we can define when such table lose data 

But in real - there is no need in this feature - databases are made to hold
data, not to lose.

If an application requires mechanism to store transient session-data, it
should create its own session-objects. 

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Guillaume SmetDate: 2009-04-28 15:35:36
Subject: Re: Clean shutdown and warm standby
Previous:From: Heikki LinnakangasDate: 2009-04-28 15:22:18
Subject: Re: Clean shutdown and warm standby

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group