Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Performance Improvement by reducing WAL for Update Operation

From: Amit kapila <amit(dot)kapila(at)huawei(dot)com>
To: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Performance Improvement by reducing WAL for Update Operation
Date: 2013-01-12 14:10:45
Message-ID: 6C0B27F7206C9E4CA54AE035729E9C383BEB017E@szxeml509-mbs (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Saturday, January 12, 2013 4:36 PM Simon Riggs wrote:
On 11 January 2013 15:57, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:

>>>> I've moved this to the next CF. I'm planning to review this one first.
>>
>>> Thank you.
>
>> Just reviewing the patch now, making more sense with comments added.

> Making more sense, but not yet making complete sense.

> I'd like you to revisit the patch comments since some of them are
> completely unreadable.

  I will once again review all the comments and make them more meaningful.

With Regards,
Amit Kapila.




In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Simon RiggsDate: 2013-01-12 16:39:15
Subject: Hash twice
Previous:From: Amit kapilaDate: 2013-01-12 14:07:26
Subject: Re: Performance Improvement by reducing WAL for Update Operation

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group