Re: Postgres tracking - the pgtrack project

From: "Magnus Hagander" <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net>
To: "Bruce Momjian" <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, "Greg Sabino Mullane" <greg(at)turnstep(dot)com>
Cc: <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Postgres tracking - the pgtrack project
Date: 2006-09-04 11:35:42
Message-ID: 6BCB9D8A16AC4241919521715F4D8BCEA3561B@algol.sollentuna.se
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-www

> Right now, the release notes show a list of all the significant
> items in each release, but it isn't available until the release,
> and it isn't complete (because it would be unreadable by ordinary
> users). And there is no tracking of individual items in progress
> except by individual developers. Magnus, for example, tracks Win32
> items, and Tom tracks backend stuff. I track whatever no one else
> tracks.

Well, I *try*. I find myself not managing quite as well as I'd like ;-)
So I for one would definitely appreciate a tool that would help with
that - provided that the tool fits the development model, not the other
way around.

(most other things seems to have been said already this time around, so
I won't repeat arguments others have made)

//Magnus

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Gregory Stark 2006-09-04 11:46:37 Re: @ versus ~, redux
Previous Message Simon Riggs 2006-09-04 11:12:31 Re: [PATCHES] WIP archive_timeout patch

Browse pgsql-www by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2006-09-05 01:10:44 Re: Open items for 8.2
Previous Message Carlo Florendo 2006-09-04 08:24:52 Re: Getting a move on for 8.2 beta