Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: BUG #2371: database crashes with semctl failed

From: "Magnus Hagander" <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net>
To: "Peter Brant" <Peter(dot)Brant(at)wicourts(dot)gov>,<Qingqing Zhou <zhouqq(at)cs(dot)toronto(dot)edu>, <pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: BUG #2371: database crashes with semctl failed
Date: 2006-05-02 08:14:10
Message-ID: 6BCB9D8A16AC4241919521715F4D8BCEA35336@algol.sollentuna.se (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs
> With the patch applied, I let an inhouse stress test run for 
> several hours and it completed without incident.  I also ran 
> two runs of pgbench with 50 connections x 1000 transactions 
> and one run of 50 connections x 5000 transactions.  All 
> completed successfully.  (Test server is a dual Xeon with 
> HyperThreading enabled, Windows Server 2003, PG 8.1.3).

Great news. One question though - Win 2003 with or without SP1? Wasn't
this one of the things that showed up at least more often when you had
SP1 applied?

//Magnus

Responses

pgsql-bugs by date

Next:From: JamesDate: 2006-05-02 10:34:12
Subject: BUG #2417: bug for finding string in column
Previous:From: Peter BrantDate: 2006-05-01 16:50:50
Subject: Re: BUG #2371: database crashes with semctl failed

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group