| From: | "Magnus Hagander" <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
| Cc: | "Peter Eisentraut" <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, "David Fetter" <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, "Guillaume Lelarge" <guillaume(at)lelarge(dot)info>, "Josh Berkus" <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, <pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Switching to XML |
| Date: | 2006-12-11 20:56:28 |
| Message-ID: | 6BCB9D8A16AC4241919521715F4D8BCEA0FDF2@algol.sollentuna.se |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-docs |
> The real problem here is that you've still failed to
> establish any sizable benefit from converting. As best I can
> tell at the moment, the acceptable options for editing XML
> will be about the same as they are for SGML: emacs, and not a
> lot else. I don't really see why I should have to start
> spelling out every closing tag for a no-op like that.
Visual Studio has a *very* nice XML editor these days, and they don't do
SGML...
(ok, ok, that's a joke. It's true, sure, but it's not very relevant...)
//Magnus
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2006-12-11 21:07:03 | Re: Switching to XML |
| Previous Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2006-12-11 20:43:27 | Re: Switching to XML |