Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Release stamping (Was: [CORE] Schedule for release?)

From: "Magnus Hagander" <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net>
To: "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: "Dave Page" <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk>,<pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Release stamping (Was: [CORE] Schedule for release?)
Date: 2006-10-24 21:24:22
Message-ID: 6BCB9D8A16AC4241919521715F4D8BCEA0FCC5@algol.sollentuna.se (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
> >> Why not?  The shipped tarball would contain exactly the same
> >> pg_config.h.win32 it does today; the only difference is that the 
> >> version info would've been inserted automatically instead of 
> >> manually.
> 
> > Right. And then you can only build from tarball and not 
> from CVS, right?
> 
> But isn't that true for borland already?  We've got the .def 
> files for libpq and the help-file for psql that we don't 
> expect a borland environment to be able to build.

Borland, yes. MSVC, no. So I guess we could hav ethe MSVC bulid script
generate it for MSVC, and then stick it in the tarball for borland. It's
two different ways to do the same thing, but I guess we can do that..

//Magnus

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Simon RiggsDate: 2006-10-24 22:05:37
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Replication documentation addition
Previous:From: Dave PageDate: 2006-10-24 21:06:41
Subject: Re: Release stamping (Was: [CORE] Schedule for

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group