| From: | "Magnus Hagander" <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [PATCHES] Fix for running from admin account on win32 |
| Date: | 2006-01-14 20:18:18 |
| Message-ID: | 6BCB9D8A16AC4241919521715F4D8BCE92E9C4@algol.sollentuna.se |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
> > If the job object code is moved to the postmaster, it'll
> work when not
> > running as a service as well.
>
> I'd just as soon keep all that Windows-specific cruft in pg_ctl.
> So I think the way you've got it set up is fine.
Well, it'd all be localised to the backend/port/win32 directory of
course, except for a single call - where there is already "windows
cruft".
But. I see your point. And the vast majority of production
installations run as service anyway. So I won't spend any time making
those changes, I'll leave what's on -patches now.
//Magnus
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Martijn van Oosterhout | 2006-01-14 20:33:39 | Re: Surrogate keys (Was: enums) |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2006-01-14 18:44:19 | Re: [PATCHES] Fix for running from admin account on win32 |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | andrew5 | 2006-01-14 22:54:17 | BUG #2171: Differences compiling plpgsql in ecpg and psql |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2006-01-14 18:44:19 | Re: [PATCHES] Fix for running from admin account on win32 |