Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [PATCHES] Fix for running from admin account on win32

From: "Magnus Hagander" <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net>
To: "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] Fix for running from admin account on win32
Date: 2006-01-14 20:18:18
Message-ID: 6BCB9D8A16AC4241919521715F4D8BCE92E9C4@algol.sollentuna.se (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackerspgsql-patches
> > If the job object code is moved to the postmaster, it'll 
> work when not 
> > running as a service as well.
> 
> I'd just as soon keep all that Windows-specific cruft in pg_ctl.
> So I think the way you've got it set up is fine.

Well, it'd all be localised to the backend/port/win32 directory of
course, except for a single call - where there is already "windows
cruft".

But. I see your point. And the  vast majority of production
installations run as service anyway. So I won't spend any time making
those changes, I'll leave what's on -patches now.

//Magnus

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Martijn van OosterhoutDate: 2006-01-14 20:33:39
Subject: Re: Surrogate keys (Was: enums)
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2006-01-14 18:44:19
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] Fix for running from admin account on win32

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: andrew5Date: 2006-01-14 22:54:17
Subject: BUG #2171: Differences compiling plpgsql in ecpg and psql
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2006-01-14 18:44:19
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] Fix for running from admin account on win32

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group