> > That would be fairly trivial ... let me add it to the 'todo
> list' ...
> > I take it that it would be safe to relegate the
> /pub/source/OLD stuff
> > there too?
> Not so trivial to put behind a web interface or the download
> tracker though. Is it really necessary to have a separate
> archive downloads site? It's not like the old ones get in the
> way, or cost anything other than disk space on the mirrors to
> store (and I've only ever heard mirror admins say how small
> our site is compared to many others!).
> Plus of course, weren't we trying to reduce the number of VMs/sites?
Agreed. If we're going to keep it, just sticking it in a /old/ directory
is definitly a lot better.
pgsql-www by date
|Next:||From: Marc G. Fournier||Date: 2005-12-01 19:09:07|
|Subject: Re: [PATCHES] aclchk.c refactor |
|Previous:||From: Andrew Dunstan||Date: 2005-12-01 17:21:46|
|Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Upcoming PG re-releases|
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Jonah H. Harris||Date: 2005-12-01 18:45:48|
|Subject: Re: generalizing the planner knobs|
|Previous:||From: Jaime Casanova||Date: 2005-12-01 18:24:20|
|Subject: Re: 8.1, OID's and plpgsql|