Re: [PATCHES] pgxs under Win32 for PL/Java

From: "Magnus Hagander" <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net>
To: "Thomas Hallgren" <thhal(at)mailblocks(dot)com>, "Fabien COELHO" <coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr>
Cc: "PostgreSQL Developers" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "PostgreSQL Patches" <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] pgxs under Win32 for PL/Java
Date: 2004-11-07 11:36:17
Message-ID: 6BCB9D8A16AC4241919521715F4D8BCE4760CE@algol.sollentuna.se
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

>I can test cygwin too. But just out of curiosity; why would
>anyone want
>to use cygwin with 8.0?

It runs on 9x, native requires NT. There are still a lot of ppl on 9x. I
wouldn't expect a production server on 9x (indeed not a server at all),
but certainly some desktops that are using it.

//Magnus

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Ameen - Etemady 2004-11-07 11:46:06 CREATE TYPE with two args
Previous Message Joachim Wieland 2004-11-07 11:15:28 Re: Documentation on PITR still scarce

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Markus Bertheau 2004-11-07 12:56:27 Re: contrib/xml2: add function xml_encode_special_chars
Previous Message Neil Conway 2004-11-07 11:25:41 Re: GiST: memory allocation, cleanup