Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: FAT or NTFS on W2k

From: "Magnus Hagander" <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net>
To: "chips42" <chips42(at)adelphia(dot)net>,"postgresql" <pgsql-hackers-win32(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: FAT or NTFS on W2k
Date: 2004-07-21 07:56:52
Message-ID: 6BCB9D8A16AC4241919521715F4D8BCE34BEC7@algol.sollentuna.se (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers-win32
> Hi,
>     I have been having problems with both the cygwin and the 
> native port of postgreSQL. I currently have my hard drive 
> formatted as FAT32. Should I convert to NTFS? I have been 
> looking at the archives it is encouraged but not prohibited 
> if I understand the posts correctly.

Yes, if at all possible you should. On a production server, *make* it
possible.

It's a bit far-fetched to say that is the cause of your problems,
though. We need to know exactly what the problems are (error messages,
what does not work etc) to help with that.

//Magnus

pgsql-hackers-win32 by date

Next:From: Claudio NatoliDate: 2004-07-21 08:23:46
Subject: Re: win2k, service, pg_ctl, popen, etc
Previous:From: Justin WyerDate: 2004-07-21 07:00:27
Subject: Re: FAT or NTFS on W2k

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group