Re: New horology failure

From: "Magnus Hagander" <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net>
To: "Manfred Koizar" <mkoi-pg(at)aon(dot)at>, "Christopher Kings-Lynne" <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>
Cc: "PostgreSQL-development" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: New horology failure
Date: 2004-05-24 18:46:18
Message-ID: 6BCB9D8A16AC4241919521715F4D8BCE34BABC@algol.sollentuna.se
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

>>I get this since Tom's commit.
>
>>--- ./results/horology.out Sun May 23 11:39:49 2004
>>***************
>>*** 1787,1796 ****
>>! | Sat Sep 22 18:19:20 2001 PDT | @ 34 years
> | Fri Sep 22 18:19:20 1967 PDT
>>[...]
>>--- 1787,1796 ----
>>! | Sat Sep 22 18:19:20 2001 PDT | @ 34 years
> | Fri Sep 22 18:19:20 1967 PST
>>[...]
>
>I got the same with snapshot-20040521 yesterday [i.e. 2004-05-22]
>afternoon when I ran make check. But only once. make installcheck
>passed all tests, and the failure didn't reappear when I tried make
>check again.
>
>I just got the failure again with make check after having configured
>with a new install directory. My guess is that horology needs some
>datafile from the install location.

Not only a file, but the entire directory "<pginstall>/share/timezone",
with subdirs.

Without it, it will parse "PST8PDT" using the default DST rules. If it
finds the file (named PST8PDT in that directory), it will use the
correct DST rules.

//Magnus

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Ismail Kizir 2004-05-24 18:49:41 Re: Optimizer bug??
Previous Message Gaetano Mendola 2004-05-24 18:40:52 Re: Optimizer bug??